bruceb wrote:OK, OK, I will defend myself since no one else is going to. :
I am NOT opposed to "computerisation in general."
I am only against it in uses that are wholly unnecessary and serve no one but the computer industry. I love the computers in my computers. Without them the computers would not work and I could not express my wholly objective opinions to the world.
I don't need digital electronics in a microscope, an espresso machine or a motorbike. When Dom's fuel injection stops working in the middle of the Massif Central (or the middle of Birmingham) he'll wish it didn't need an update.
Luddites didn't want industrialisation (no mention of computerisation, btw) because it put men out of work. I certainly don't want to work, so my motivation is quite different.
Could this be just another manifestation of a phenomenon documented by a great philosopher?
1. Anything that is in the world when you're born is normal and ordinary and is just a natural part of the way the world works.
2. Anything that's invented between when you're fifteen and thirty-five is new and exciting and revolutionary and you can probably get a career in it.
3. Anything invented after you're thirty-five is against the natural order of things.
Douglas Adams - The Salmon of Doubt
Perhaps a fourth point is now warranted:
4. Anything that's invented after you're sixty is wholly unnecessary and serves no one but the industry involved.
bruceb - TMC Forum